Selling and closing a large multi-site technology deal is a huge win. But once the contract is signed, a new challenge begins.
The operations, commissions, and revenue assurance teams all face the same critical question: How do we track, manage, and forecast revenue when one deal spans dozens, or even hundreds, of locations, each with different install dates?
At RPM, we work closely with Technology Advisors and Technology Services Distributors (TSDs) to solve this exact problem. Here’s what we’ve learned about effectively managing multi-site orders to protect revenue and improve workflows.
Consider this scenario: A Technology Advisor closes a 100-site, $100K MRR, 3-year term deal. On paper, the Total Contract Value (TCV) is $3.6M. Great work, sales team!
Most sales teams track this as a single order for simplicity. Unfortunately, this approach causes headaches for operations, commissions, and revenue assurance teams because install dates vary by location, some sites may never get installed, and revenue and commissions only flow when each site goes live.
If you care about revenue assurance, you need a better structure.
Install dates aren’t just calendar entries; they drive business-critical decisions across multiple teams:
Simply put, tracking install dates accurately is essential for managing multi-site orders and revenue assurance.
Supplier data is inconsistent.
Some suppliers:
Others:
This inconsistency makes it extremely difficult to reliably track installs and accurately forecast revenue without additional effort.
The most effective way to manage multi-site deals is by breaking them down into a Parent–Child order structure within your CRM or in RPM. Here’s how it works:
This structure provides clarity and control across the entire order lifecycle.
Accurate install tracking begins with timely access to order data. Companies can take a proactive approach by regularly gathering data from suppliers, project management teams, or directly from customers. Alternatively, a reactive approach relies on waiting for commission data to arrive after the fact.
Being proactive offers clear advantages: it enables better forecasting of expected revenue and improves data reliability by pulling from multiple sources. However, it requires discipline, coordination, and consistent effort across teams.
Being reactive is less resource-intensive, but comes with trade-offs. It depends entirely on upstream data sources as the sole source of truth, and the information may arrive too late to influence operational decisions or the timeframe for supplier commission disputes.
RPM simplifies multi-site order management by:
By setting up your orders correctly from the start, RPM helps you improve accuracy and revenue assurance. For in-depth information on how you can use RPM to manage your orders, review this webinar.
Closing a big multi-site deal is exciting, and managing the order effectively is important for revenue assurance and expansion.
Best practice:
Whether you manage this in your CRM or with RPM, this approach ensures accurate forecasting, clean reporting, and timely commission payouts.
Because at the end of the day, it’s your revenue, it’s your responsibility.